|
|
|
|
|
|
by goldbeck
4058 days ago
|
|
|
There is absolutely a point. It's possible to oppose surveillance on multiple fronts. The whole point of checks and balances is that the government doesn't do everything it can do, nor does it act as a unified whole. A bad actor in one branch can be held in check by a good actor in another. If the police/FBI/whomever wanted to storm a government center, it's theoretically up to a court to determine if that is legal and constitutional. |
|
|