[horshod]

What kind of a job does this apply to? I and every single friend of mine that went through interviews for tech companies had to go through multiple rounds of technical interviews that mainly involved problem solving, followed by like one non-technical interview.

[matthewrhoden1]

I applied to full stack positions for mid to senior level. Some do go into technical questions, that's what the brush up is for, however they usually target exactly what was in their job description.

If you're an engineer I'm assuming you can usually fight your way through a problem they give you. A lot of places I interviewed seemed to do the same thing -> (man I have an interview, better google a few questions to ask them).

The important part is that you look at their job description, you will usually cover 75% of the interview preparing like that.

[soham]

This is true for smaller companies, that hire for targeted roles, take the time to write good job descriptions and may even think a bit about what they are doing, because every person they hire makes or breaks the company.

The moment a company enters growth phase and they need a lot of talent, nearly everything goes out of the window. Most (not all) job descriptions become generic and less thoughtful and they resort to generic technical questions in interviews, simply because there aren't that many candidates who have relevant backgrounds (e.g. I need someone to work on deployment systems, but you have payment systems background) and they can't wait forever.

Obviously there are exceptions on both sides, but this is generally how it pans out, in my experience.

(Source: Years of hiring in the Valley, and now running http://InterviewKickstart.com)