[Dylan16807]

> So, taking the precautions is neutral until a student is harmed by them and then it becomes wrong?

No, I'll try to be clearer. The very idea of precautions is neutral. Specific precautions are good or bad based on whether they are likely to harm the student and/or prevent harm.

> I would imagine a university has the right to remove anyone from campus and ask that they not return.

Once someone has started a degree program at a university, I would very much hope that cause is required to remove them.

> But why is it the university's responsibility to help in a case where they choose not to do so?

They don't have to 'help', per se, but I expect them to not hinder. They are already giving away counseling, all they have to do is not interfere. Keep to the existing agreement. (Without using any "cancel at any time" loopholes they put into their contract of adhesion.)