|
|
|
|
|
by asveikau
4063 days ago
|
|
> Had Clang existed when Apple were implementing Obj-C, they'd have used that, there'd be no open source Obj-C frontend Microsoft wouldn't be able to do this without considerably more work. Ah, OK... So you mean if NeXT hadn't based their 1980s effort on GCC, i.e. if there had been a decent BSD-licensed C compiler back then. It's worth mentioning that this was a long time ago, before a fair number of HN readers were born, and also at a time when GPL vs. BSD licensing likely wasn't as much of a topic as today. Comparing GCC with Clang when we're talking about things that happened in 1988[1] just doesn't seem to make any sense to me. [1] Per Wikipedia's article on Objective-C, the year that NeXT's GCC changes happened. |
|