Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by binaryatrocity 4065 days ago
First of all, Mozilla is talking about slowly shutting down -features- in their browser to non-https sites, especially those that could pose a security risk to the user or their computer. I see nothing wrong with that.

Second, Mozilla is partnering with the EFF to launch Let's Encrypt! which will be a Certificate Authority providing free and automated SSL certs - so that should remove the 'resource barrier' the OP is so concerned about.

Mozilla is taking steps in the right direction to provide a safer internet for all of us, but more importantly, those of us that don't know any better, don't know how to protect themselves.

Keep it up Mozilla Team!

1 comments

I personally don't think the existence of Let's Encrypt makes mandatory encryption more palatable. Requiring encryption is a problem because it introduces one more filter I must pass through before getting my message/app/product out on the web. Now in addition to the DNS registrar and the hosting provider, I have to make Let's Encrypt or some other CA happy---jump through their hoops, not upset their politics, etc.

I'm just not okay with that.