|
|
|
|
|
by CountHackulus
4072 days ago
|
|
I worked at IBM for 5 years, and some of the teams I was on used "agile" development methods. In that they used the names, but our "scrums" were an hour long, in a meeting room, with everyone bringing their laptop. Management more than 1 level up expected waterfall-like development, so it all just meshed badly. I really don't hold out much hope that this is going to work out that well without a whole bunch of training and people actually wanting it. |
|
I won't say we were following agile, exactly, but the concept remains approximately the same. Big company management thrives on the mistaken notion that they can plan out the world years in advance. The key insights that made our adapters work were 1) no one has enough of a memory to hold anyone to those plans even six months down the line and 2) no one expects anything to work anyway, since they're all used to their plans falling over.
Which isn't to say this is going to work. I suspect that, like all things recent IBM, any success they find will be more attributable to inertia than execution excellence.
edit: clarification