|
|
|
|
|
by Nursie
4067 days ago
|
|
If you're puzzling over this you've done it wrong. There is no inference from silence. There is no humanity in such a question, there is simply the information you're given and the application of logic to narrow down the answers. The Singaporean kids that took the exam knew this and anyone that's ever taken a maths or logic exam should know this. You don't guess what might have happened from human behaviour because you don't know, you don't look for a 'trick' to give away the answer, you simply use the data in the question to narrow down the possibilities until you can arrive at an answer. The moment you think "but what if this action could have taken place because if he knew he would have said" you have failed. And you probably suck at debugging. |
|