|
|
|
|
|
by vacri
4074 days ago
|
|
I find the problems with puzzles like these is not the rules, but the ridiculously contrived situations. Why do these entities that function like inert logic gates have to be human? It means that the question has to have silly rule placed on silly rule in order to keep the contrived situation afloat. It means I end up thinking of ways for the mute, inert people to free themselves from the island (who is feeding them? Are there trees to build a raft? etc), rather than 'play by the rules'. |
|
I get your point. Still, it's hard to define the puzzle in terms of not-people. Maybe you could call them intelligent robots -- people might find it easier to picture mute robots with hats.