|
|
|
|
|
by danans
4077 days ago
|
|
While it's not nearly as small as the one in the article, my house is on the smaller end of many Bay Area homes (1600 sqft on a very narrow lot). But nobody who visits believes that it's only 1600 sqft - they all think it's closer to 2000, probably because the architect vaulted the entry/living-room ceiling to 15ft, and the upstairs bedrooms to 13 ft. What's harder about living in a small house as your primary home (not a vacation home like the article) is storage space, especially when you have kids. There are also clever ways of doing built-in storage in a small home that minimize the use of living space. Of course you also can't be a packrat. I recommend Dwell magazine as a great source for small living space design ideas. |
|
http://m.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/36576725?search_ident...