|
|
|
|
|
|
by greenmountin
4072 days ago
|
|
|
The opposition did a terrible job of defending dog sniffs during the oral arguments. They could not articulate a reasonable rule for when they should be allowed (except that they were ok until the ticket was written). The justices repeatedly presented hypotheticals, but the guy just didn't get it. [1hr MP3 of oral arguments]
http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13_9972 |
|
|