|
|
|
|
|
by anigbrowl
4075 days ago
|
|
“It’s not illegal to change a business name,” said Lisa Dilg of the Detroit BBB. “I don’t know how it’s legal, because it’s like hiding. But because it’s not illegal, there is no way to find out if the companies have been changing names and popping up in BBBs across the U.S. looking like they have no affiliation to each other.” This is a weak point in America's business culture, and there's an opportunity to engineer it away. Fictitious business name applications (and changes) take place on a county-by-county basis, and there are ~3000 counties in America, all with their own set of records and their own administrative systems. Varying rules by county and state make it really easy for businesses to hide from consumer scrutiny. Indeed, I think part of the reason that people feel 'government' sucks is not that we have too much government, but that we have too many governments and it's too easy for bad actors to work this system...or rather the >3000 slightly different systems that are very poorly integrated. |
|
I actually assumed the article would be about the Southwestern company, an organization whose reputation for exploiting its self-employed staff is known on the other side of the Atlantic, but still recruits from the university campuses that haven't banned it. But they've been enlisting college-age kids to sell books on doorsteps under exactly the same name since just after the Civil War and they pay their BBB dues...
Some of these companies are dirtier, but the problem with "self-employed" remote salespeople whose lives are controlled by the company is deeper than knowing who the entities are, since neither the crews nor the people that actually persuaded to buy the merchandise are likely to do the research. That's the part where more protection is needed
And I say this as someone that did a self-employed remote door-to-door job in consecutive summers with the same company back at university whilst having other options.