|
|
|
|
|
|
by 0xdeadbeefbabe
4079 days ago
|
|
|
> If that's legitimately your opinion on that topic then I suggest you expand your knowledge. So, If my knowledge were expanded I would think NoSQL is an equally valid option, and not a worse one? I hesitate to do any more expansion because of this panel held in 2014 [0] asking weather we are in a big data bubble, and probably answering "yes", but I wasn't there. Simple query language is REALLY good too. It has a kind of general usefulness. > Keep in mind that NoSQL doesn't mean schemaless. You can have a schema and be NoSQL Can you also have SQL and be NoSQL? [0] http://people.csail.mit.edu/tatbul/publications/sigmod14_pan... |
|
|
For some things NoSQL would be a better option. For most things SQL remains the better option.
> I hesitate to do any more expansion because of this panel held in 2014 [0] asking weather we are in a big data bubble, and probably answering "yes", but I wasn't there.
We were in a dot-com bubble around 97-2000, maybe the internet is a bad idea also?
> Can you also have SQL and be NoSQL?
By definition, no. But some NoSQL databases do support an alternative to SQL with some of SQL's properties (e.g. JSON-like syntax).