|
|
|
|
|
by ezegolub
4082 days ago
|
|
If any of the engines has a TWR above one when landing, even at it's lowest setting, i can't help but wonder why don't they use a smaller engine which can be more effectively used to land. I'm sure theres a perfectly good reason for this, there's a reason SpaceX has its reputation, but i'm curious as to why. |
|
If they can't get them on the ground reliably with just the Merlins after trying enough, then maybe they'll do something like that. But if it's a simple matter of software and a handful of tests, as it seems may be the case, then they've saved a lot of effort and cost.
The other answer is that the F9 architecture was designed (and flying) before this mode of recovery was "the one". And they'd prefer to not redesign the thing if it can work as-is. So they'll try it and see before spending gobs of money on a re-design. Rockets aren't software (except to the extent they are) and changing things about them is dangerous and expensive.