|
|
|
|
|
|
by Kiro
4079 days ago
|
|
|
> by saying that banning zero rating is to deny poor people access. I may be naive but I kind of agree. I also think zero rating sounds great in theory. The alternative is that people cannot access at all? Can you post some arguments of why it is bad? Net neutrality doesn't tell me anything. Why would I as a consumer care about that? |
|
|