Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tracker1 4088 days ago
Which is kind of sad... I get the objections to "WebSQL" as it kind of lacked a standard to the support/syntax. But given that it was SQLite (v3 iirc) everywhere, it should have just specified SQLite v3's interface, and MS could have fallen into line with Firefox, Chrome and Safari.

IndexedDB is a better fit for no-sql style use in the browser, but sometimes you really need something closer to SQL.

1 comments

That would have meant everyone would've been stuck with SQLite3's quirks forever. It may be good but it's not that good!