|
|
|
|
|
|
by trynumber9
4085 days ago
|
|
|
In the linked paper, they describe their choice of 180nm as optimal for power. Given the tools they used, they could make an even smaller computer with 130nm or 90nm technology. But the power draw would be higher according to the graph. Or they could add more memory instead of a smaller size. The CPU is absolutely tiny, not much larger than the temperature sensor. |
|
|