[codexon]

I just showed you it wasn't an arbitrary choice and that it has a mathematical basis.

Someone who has the ability to eliminate at least 1 choice understands the question better than someone who doesn't know what the question is asking at all, and is appropriately rewarded for it.

[Retric]

If they removed the penalty and automatically guessed for questions left blank that would have the same effect mathematically, but women would score better. (AKA blank questions would be worth (1/number of choices) on average and educated guessing would improve your score on average.)

So, it is an arbitrary choice.

[codexon]

That's the most awful suggestion I've ever heard.

You want a test to introduce MORE randomness just to please 1 group of people on a test that is supposed to measure your math ability including the ability to understand their simple guessing penalty?

You want everyone to think in the back of their mind that they got screwed by the SAT's random number generator or that some idiots hit the jackpot and get a much higher score than they should have?

[Retric]

It all depends on where your coming from. The SAT test designers might want to promote the idea you should take and pay for the test several times to get lucky. I suspect this might be why they had pro guessing scores in the first place. They could also give you 4 points for the right answer and 3 for a blank question vs 0 points for a wrong answer. Which would penalize people that randomly guessed.

In any case this specific rule happens to benefit white men more than other groups so clearly that's going to bother people. As to the math idea, they score the English section independently so having people do math as part of the English section seems counter intuitive.

PS: I am a white male that happened to crush the SAT, but I also accept the test was biased in my favor.

[codexon]

Again you are completely missing the point. The SAT is not "pro" guessing. It is mathematically neutral.

If you get rid of guessing completely, then there's no way to differentiate between people who have no clue what the question is and people who actually have a clue. Giving 3 points for a blank question rewards people who are clueless and punishes people that aren't.

If you really did crush the SAT I am rather confused how you fail to understand any of this.

PS: this thought just ran past my mind, it seems like you actually think your scoring scheme is actually mathematically fair. Someone that is able to eliminate 1/5 answers will average 1 point per question (4 points / 4 choices) Someone who cannot eliminate any answers gets 3 points per question??? Where is the logic in that?

If you crushed the SAT they must have removed the probability questions these days lol.