|
|
|
|
|
by crescendo
6057 days ago
|
|
The problem with analyzing companies like this is that they don't really admit of a traditional value-based assessment. What is the value proposition of a service like Vidly, really? It shortens the process of posting a video link to Twitter by a few steps. Yes, I'm understating what they do, but when you distill it down to its actual benefit to an end user, that's it. Option 1:
1) Open youtube.com.
2) Create a youtube account (First time only).
3) Post video to Youtube.
4) Open twitter.com, or a Twitter client.
5) Post a tweet with the Youtube link.
Option 2:
1) Open vidly.com (or client?).
2) Post video and tweet to Twitter.
You've reduced the steps it takes to post a video to Twitter from 5 to 2; big whoop, right? But looking at this alone misses the point. Here's where it gets interesting: given that they're both free, and that users actually know about Option 2, most of them will choose Option 2 without hesitation. Besides that, the relative complexity of using Youtube for this task might have been a barrier for many people who otherwise would've posted videos. When you combine this with good marketing, the vibrant user base of Twitter, and a large mass of people hungry to broadcast videos, big things can happen. |
|
Actually YouTube integrates with both Facebook and Twitter now. Go to My Account > Settings > Sharing and you can link your Facebook and Twitter accounts.
Once you upload a video, it will automatically update your status for both services.
I use YouTube for my uploads mainly because it's one of the built-in upload options for Android. I believe this is true for the IPhone too.