[striking]

>This decision was taken keeping the security of the users in mind. I hope you understand.

Funny, because this is the exact inverse of the situation. They introduce security bugs and then we are unable to fix them ourselves.

They are legally required to provide the sources they use for u-boot.

[ploxiln]

It is funny... I get the feeling that they still give this response, because everyone who's gotten it doesn't know how to respond, it's so obviously wrong.

They use a lot of open source software and make firmware updates and controller software readily available, so how could they not know that

* The GPL's legal requirements come before your products needs, your users security or whatever. If you can't use GPL'd software, then don't.

* open source software has always proven to be more secure, because relatively serious and obvious security bugs linger in closed source software for a long time. How can we know that your closed source software is better than history suggests (unless you release the source...)

ridiculous. I kinda hope some of their engineers notice this on HN and can use evidence of "public" (engineer) sentiment to pressure the management