|
|
|
|
|
by jfager
4086 days ago
|
|
I'm bored of C++ apologists pretending like there's really such a thing as 'modern and idiomatic C++11/14' that any two C++ programmers actually agree on, or that you'd ever actually see practiced consistently in the wild. You can no-true-Scotsman code that compiles, runs, and blows up in your face with any modern C++ compiler all you want, it doesn't change the fact that Rust eliminates entire classes of errors that are trivial to hit in C++. |
|
Until then, it is going to be "Modern" C++ for the lower layers/common code, with the platform vendor languages for the upper layers, regardless how Rust improves over C++.
I am a big fan of the type safety of Pascal and ML language families, but eco-systems have more weight than just the language.