Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jmzwar 4089 days ago
How can 'Stupid Shit No One Needs' be classified as a social critique by any respectable semantician?
3 comments

>How can 'Stupid Shit No One Needs' be classified as a social critique by any respectable semantician?

In that we live in a society that, alas, DOES produce "stupid shit no one needs" by the ton?

Because it makes people smile?

Also because they are actually going to make it?

Emoji is stupid shit no one needs. It also makes people smile.

Do you really need to criticise the actions of others as 'stupid' to make yourself smile?
Is your dogged persistence in this thread simply a test of our collective ability to abide by the new policy?
No.

They are your own ideas, or ideas of others at the hackathon where they self-identified as stupid.

how very meta; I was doing the exact thing to your post (criticizing your actions as stupid, and making myself smile).
There is nothing sacred enough to be protected from the words stupid, shit, fuck or any other word.
My point isn't that stupid ideas don't exist, but that the great ones seem stupid. Dropbox was criticised on here; many thought AirBnb stupid.
Ok, I am going to bite. AirBnb is stupid. Every child that has heard about the Little Red Riding Hood should be able to figure that out.

The fact that we do not hear about even more horrible incidents regarding this service is for the most part due to society being overwhelmingly composed of more or less moral individuals (with an active remediation and PR campaign from the incumbents as a distant second reason). But I find hard to believe that anyone who can do any half decent risk assessment would sign in for that kind of liability.

Agreed! So was Facebook--it was just another MySpace clone. Or Google--another search engine. Sometimes the best ideas are seemingly stupid and pointless. I think the name is tongue-in-cheek because "stupid things" tend to become great ideas. I think it's a great idea this is going on.
No, it's not tongue-in-cheek: staggeringly, stupid ideas generally (like, as in 99.9% generally) aren't, or don't become great ideas.
I agree, except you need more 9s.
If you accept that then you've missed the broader point. Not a single founder would want their idea to appear on next years board of stupid ideas to satirise.