|
|
|
|
|
|
by atourgates
4091 days ago
|
|
|
> $200 for a $100 photo is totally reasonable; $1000 and he has no moral argument. How do you figure? I think 10x is an entirely reasonable penalty for stealing* someone's work instead of paying for it lawfully. The MPAA demanded $30,000 for a $0.99 song, which I would say is completely unreasonable. But 10x seems pretty inline with a non-excessive penalty. |
|
|