[aslewofmice]

I don't get the hate, I think it's a great idea. It's completely opt-in and both sides win.

[nfoz]

"Both sides win" when a consumer chooses to spend their money on gambling. They're getting what they pay for, of their own volition.

I consider advertising to be offensive, and think it's appropriate for a society (big or small) to control what forms of ads are allowed via law. I'd like to see limits on what sorts of trade-offs we can make with respect to ads, so that the life experience of a citizen need not be drowning in advertisement.

Riding a taxi in NYC (where ads are built-in to the cabs and cannot be stopped) is a distinctly unpleasant experience compared to elsewhere. We can only have so many forms of transit available to the people of NYC. I would rather we choose to remove the ads and pay for the transportation system via direct-monetary transfer, or taxation, or some combination. shrug

[icebraining]

"Both sides win" when a consumer chooses to spend their money on gambling. They're getting what they pay for, of their own volition.

Yes, they do. With some exceptions, gambling is an harmless activity that people engage in just for the fun, not expecting to win. Or quoting Motörhead: You win some, lose some, it's all the same to me / The pleasure is to play, it makes no difference what you say / I don't share your greed

[phdp]

Hit the button on the bottom right corner of the screen. First thing I do when I get in a taxi.

[nfoz]

It doesn't turn off the screen, and it doesn't turn off the ads. It stops the moving video and audio, and replaces it with a mostly-static blue screen with a few ads that jump position on the screen now and then.