|
|
|
|
|
by xnull2guest
4094 days ago
|
|
The opinions of powerful people are indeed appeals from authority by the media that (selectively) publish them. So I would agree with this, sans the universal (there are powerful people who are experts in an area of law as a counterexample). How could a media outlet make it more clear something is an opinion? They could put it in the title and in the body of the article as a start. They could add content to contextualize the opinion and remind the reader that the opinion maker holds no authority on the matter. They could link to opinion holders with opposing views but equal status. There are a myriad of ways they could do this - some of them very minimal ("Tom Cook opinion: Pro-discrimination 'religious freedom' laws are dangerous"). |
|