|
|
|
|
|
by techtivist
4095 days ago
|
|
I am always conflicted about these. I was fortunate enough to get a full ride (all grants, no loans) to a top University, even as an international student. My parents couldn't afford to pay for my flight here, which the University did. In a way that has allowed me to take a riskier career trajectory by quitting a 6 figure starting salary at a top tech company after graduation within 3 months and starting a startup. So I am ever so grateful for policies like this. But I wonder if universities should offer some sort of deferred payment (5 years after graduation for instance) to students instead (not a 3rd party loan). If you go to Stanford you are pretty much guaranteed a stable income when you graduate. Yes ,granted, a lot of alumni do donate without feeling the necessity to do so, but having such an option will help universities, perhaps more for those with smaller endowments "recover" some of the cost. Universities could always make exceptions some time down the line on a case by case basis, depending on student's current income which will vary violently even for top universities, with some students deciding to work for a non-profit while others choosing a more lucrative job, just like income tax works. Again, I am really not sure, just throwing it out there. |
|
It is a sort of post hoc means testing, in contrast to the more usual undergraduate system of pre hoc means testing.
The federal government also has income based loan forgiveness programs (the current one is called Pay as You Earn), but it is far less generous.
http://hls.harvard.edu/dept/sfs/low-income-protection-plan-l...