|
|
|
|
|
by CatDevURandom
4102 days ago
|
|
tl;dr - I'm upset because the raison d'etat for Go's name doesn't exist. Correct, no -- practical, probably. No matter how many gophers swear that {searchterm} + go returns just as good of results as {searchterm}+golang, it just isn't true. Maybe I'm just bitter because the reason Go was named Go was because -- and obviously I'm paraphrasing here... "we thought Oogle would be a really cool name for a debugger." Years later, here I am stuck searching {some search term} + GOLANG and step debugging with GDB. The worst part though is hearing people tell me, "Oh you know what, I realize how powerful printline statements and unit tests are for debugging! I don't even miss a debugger!" Or-- "have you tried GDB? Go Supports GDB! I haven't used it -- but it exists!" GDB is a god damn hate machine. And the chorus of "print statements are good enough" is motivated reasoning at its finest. |
|