Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by skunkworks 4102 days ago
Correct. Their lesson was that you shouldn't claw back equity from underperforming executives, you should just let them go.
1 comments

How do you know they were underperforming? Maybe the board just realized they could get a lot of extra money by looking for an excuse to get rid of them?
Your speculative conspiracy theory is plausible, but I work with one of the people who made this decision.