|
|
|
|
|
by chmille4
4103 days ago
|
|
I figured I could add a little clarification to this comment. * The human genome project created a "single" genome (thats not quite right, but close enough for this discussion). This was and is incredibly useful, but a single genome can only do so much. To answer population genomics questions (e.g. is this mutation common and therefore probably not disease causative) you need lots of people and the more the better. * The 23andme dataset is not whole genome data, but instead some subset of genomic locations that they consider more interesting. Still valuable but not as much as whole genome data. Also, for big whole genome datasets you can check out the 1000 Genomes Project, which has somewhere north of 2000 genomes. And there are many more big datasets in the works, which will continue to be incredibly useful! |
|
1000 Genomes looks great, but how is it funded? Also, how is the sequencing done? Presents a few more open variables, and 23andme is orders of magnitude larger.