Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sithu 4108 days ago
My wife is co-authoring a review paper on this topic with the group from Zhongshan. The rise in myopia prevalence is really quite staggering, especially among asians.

It's a long article, but the essential point is that insufficient time spent in bright light >10k lux (roughly corresponding to being in shade on a bright day) during early childhood increases the risk of developing myopia.

Normal eye growth requires dopamine which is released in a circadian fashion, which requires exposure to bright/daylight. Absence of this dopamine cycle may cause the eyeball to be more elongated, leading to refractive errors.

The precise number of hours needed to prevent myopia is difficult to say, but studies in schools with even 40-mins extra have shown benefit, and there's some evidence supporting 3+ hours/day.

Importantly, it doesn't seem to matter how much close-focal work kids do, such as computer use/studying, as long as they spend sufficient time in bright light. I'd consider setting up a study desk in front of a large window, and taking breaks at school outdoors instead of inside.

6 comments

Did anyone compare the data from this paper with the development of myopia in northern countries (e.g. Finland), where winters are dark and kids (and adults as well) would probably get only a few hours of sunlight per day (in contrast, summers are very bright)?
While myopia was not associated with the month of birth, there was a trend towards a higher prevalence of myopia among conscripts living above the Arctic Circle, consistent with the hypothesis that ambient lighting might influence refractive development.

https://www.med.upenn.edu/cpob/documents/Myopiaandnaturallig...

Do we know if it's related to the UV spectrum of the light(e.g. is this equivalent to sunlight's properties w/r to vitamin D), or is the eye exposure mostly about the visible spectrum?
Low vitamin D level was my first thought when I read the "outside light" and it looks like it could be related:

https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/vitamin-d-news/new-study-fin...

http://breakingmuscle.com/nutrition/vitamin-d-can-save-your-...

"myopia was significantly higher in individuals with vitamin D deficiency": http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970253

Or maybe people that don't get enough outside light tend to have lower vitamin D?
Are we becoming mole people? Only half joking here.
What about distant focal work (focusing your eyes on clouds, etc)? It's weird that illumination should have an effect and training focus variation doesn't?
Focusing on clouds is not much different than focusing on the other side of the room.
I don't know, I'm looking at the other side of my room right now and I can definitively see a lot of difference (additional blur) by trying to extend my depth of field. Maybe I'm focusing past infinity though.
Subjective experience does not always match with scientific fact.
Blanket statements do not always refute arguments.
How can you extend the depth of field of the eye?
Would the rise of wearing sunglasses during the last 50 or so years might have any effect as well, I wonder? After all, the eye presumably responds the same whether it's getting insufficient light because someone is indoors or because that person is outside but shielding it from >10k lux light with tinted shades.
The article states that 10k lux is about what you experience when wearing sunglasses, or sitting under a shady tree
I doubt it. Most kids don't wear sunglasses. And myopia typically presents in childhood.
Cecil Adams, of 'The Straight Dope' fame, once answered a question related to perceived vision of sitting close to TV inducing myopia [1]. Although, he plainly refuted this as a possible cause, but he cites a study where the correlation suggests that it might be the "product of our civilization".

> 'The most striking demonstration of this was a study in the late 60s of eyesight among Eskimoes in Barrow, Alaska. These people had been introduced to the joys of civilization around World War II. The incidence of myopia in those age 56 and up was zero percent; in parents age 30 and up, 8 percent; in their children, 59 percent.'

[1]: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/865/will-sitting-to...

The linked article discusses that Inuit study, too.

(Also, Cicil Adams is almost certainly not a single person.)