[meritt]

I don't agree with the verb tagging personally. It's irrelevant, isn't? Someone need to "do" something. The particular word choice doesn't impact the necessity.

@who is the assignment

#what is the task name

@when is the due-date

!do is pointless to specify.

[jackweirdy]

`do` isn’t always the verb, though.

@JoeBloggs should !do #CakeBaking

vs

@JoeBloggs should !bake #Cake

EDIT: oh, I see, you tagging verbs more generally. I disagree. It adds context.

@JoeBloggs #Contract by Friday.

What about the contract? Review, sign, amend, shred?

[meritt]

You include the word like normal, I'm saying tagging it isn't going to be helpful in the long run. Not to mention you're already including the word "should" and now a bang too? Could have very simple language detection to identify the verb if that's the goal.

Tagging things implicitly groups them and imbues the ability to search/filter/organize by them. I just have a hard time envisioning a useful scenario in which you're looking at "Show me the # of taks by verb used"

[bujatt]

While we use the word "should" on the landing page, in conversations is more flexible, hence the bang.

"@Meritt, can you please !inform the #delivery"