|
|
|
|
|
|
by nothrabannosir
4106 days ago
|
|
|
Guys, it's double licensed. You are describing exactly the point: they don't want companies to use this without paying. Pay, and you can redistribute it to your clients. This is basically for-profit code from a for-profit company, with a side dish of "open source for open source projects." It's like... like Github. Like Travis-CI. Like QT. |
|
|
Or you can release your code under the AGPL and keep all your money.
> This is basically for-profit code from a for-profit company, with a side dish of "open source for open source projects." It's like... like Github. Like Travis-CI. Like QT.
This is not like Github. Github does not release all of the source code powering their app.