|
|
|
|
|
by alexvoda
4111 days ago
|
|
I think what javert meant is this:
The sentence "Goodness of stealing is directly proportional with the net pleasure." (positive net pleasure = good) is objective.
And the sentence "Badness of stealing is inversely proportional with the net pleasure" (negative net pleasure = bad) is equally objective. These roughly convert to:
If stealing brings you pleasure it is good for you.
If stealing brings you pain it is bad for you.
If being stolen from brings you pleasure it is good for you.
If being stolen from brings you pain it is bad for you. |
|
But to clarify for anyone wondering, I would also say that stealing is never pleasurable unless someone is severely fucked up, in which case overall their life is going to be unpleasurable (shitty) in general.
So it's not like my argument is an excuse to steal.
In fact, if I were to write it all out carefully, it would be the ultimate and most compelling justification for practically never stealing.