|
|
|
|
|
|
by jeswin
4112 days ago
|
|
|
> Specifically, he said that without the virility of his license, there would be no free/open source software and that all software would be locked down and proprietary. If I were to guess, without GPL the Open Source movement may have looked very different. It might seem that GPL isn't essential today, but it may have been when the FOSS was learning to walk. Again, I don't see GPL as diminishing in importance, we'll probably see a resurgence in GPL as we start caring more about freedom. |
|
|
One could argue the other way, that the GPL seriously hindered the movement until more permissive licenses started becoming favored (like the Apache license).