| > Does this make his opinion on Facebook or privacy or freedom any more correct or valid? No. And whose opinions are correct on the topic? Who should we listen to then? Opinions are opionions and we can all evaluate them. Hopefully we can evaluate them objectively regardless who came up with them. > he obviously fails to understand the entire point behind many of these companies. He doesn't huh. Ok, if it is so obvious, can you list the things he doesn't understand. > it's because it leads to a better working social network. Granted, pretty much every single loss of privacy rule (or law) has been under the guise of "oh but this is good for you actually". > _viable_ company that wants to provide a service that a consumer other than Stallman himself will use will "infringe" on those two idiotic requirements. Really? Ok let's see, I launch my editor, I type in some code, then save it and compile. I just got a service provided to me by the authors of those programs and it might seem idiotic, but I value that service and value that I ran free software and didn't have to send my name to anyone to register that I did that. |