|
|
|
|
|
by grey-area
4121 days ago
|
|
Almost everyone does do lamest mistakes at some point, e.g.: goto:fail - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7281378 shellshock - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8365110 I'm sure whoever wrote this would feel a little chagrin when coming back to their code and seeing how inefficient it was (though it got the job done when the lists were small), and they probably would admit their shortcomings, why wouldn't they? Condescending snark is really easy, and it's easy to say in retrospect and with time to reflect that most useful code has flaws and point them out - software is never finished, and there are a lot of different levels of experience and requirements. If rubygems had never become popular, this wouldn't even be an issue. PS Rubygems isn't a web framework, it's a package management tool, so the straw man you're hacking away at is the wrong one. |
|
I was talking about the last one here.
"PS Rubygems isn't a web framework, it's a package management tool, so the straw man you're hacking away at is the wrong one."
My statement about web frameworks was not about RubyGems, it was about web frameworks, and it was an example of the state of affairs in web development.