| Thanks for the concrete examples. GitLab is faster in on some pages. The commit page probably is slower, but not by so much: wget https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master
master.1 [ <=> ] 66.40K 382KB/s in 0.2s wget https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/commits/master
master.2 100%[=====================>] 183.50K 662KB/s in 0.3s Again, your milage may vary (cache) and I do agree that the commits page of GitHub feels faster most of the time. GitLab doesn't have preview support for as many features as GitHub, but it has many other features GitHub doesn't have such as protected branches and git-annex support (version large binaries with git). There are less integrations than GitHub but I would not say there is a lack of them https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/tree/master/app/mode... We think the issue tracker is good, working with labels can be improved but getting a milestone overview across projects is pretty sweet. Availability of GitLab.com is over 99.9% at the moment http://status.gitlab.com/ Over 700 people have contributed to GitLab http://contributors.gitlab.com/ We understand if people place open source projects on GitHub, they have way more registered users. But some people choose GitLab and their numbers are growing. |
For the initial HTTP request maybe and if you're in the US. Gitlab is painfully slow when loaded from a European network connection and you factor in the time it takes to fetch all resources. Cached or uncached.
> GitLab doesn't have preview support for as many features as GitHub, but it has many other features GitHub doesn't have such as protected branches and git-annex support (version large binaries with git).
Neither of which are important for Open Source projects.
> We understand if people place open source projects on GitHub, they have way more registered users. But some people choose GitLab and their numbers are growing.
I think Gitlab is a reasonable website to use for commercial hosting; I just don't see it for Open Source software.