|
|
|
|
|
|
by john2x
4115 days ago
|
|
|
From the README > Although parts of the language may be very close to Clojure (they are both lisps after all), language parity is not a design goal. We will take the features from Clojure or other languages that are suitable to our needs, and feel free to reject those that aren't. Therefore this should not be considered a "Clojure Dialect", but instead a "Clojure inspired lisp". And I agree that seeing maybe Clojure 2.0 abandon backwards compatibility with Java < 9 would be nice. |
|
|