|
|
|
|
|
by nl
4116 days ago
|
|
Assuming this theory is wrong (and I assume it is) it is interesting to consider why it has become so popular. Firstly, there is no compelling counter-theory. The consensus view (the plane turned off its flight path for an unknown reason, flew in a mostly unknown direction for an unknown period of time and then crashed somewhere in the Indian ocean) has so many thing that are unknown that any theory offering certainty is attractive. Secondly, the "Russians stole the plane because of something to do with some Ukrainians" fits the current political narrative very well. Confirmation bias means people are likely consider it even when they probably shouldn't. Thirdly... maybe it true. Anyone have a better theory? (See how easy it is?) |
|
Theory B) Plane crashed at unexpected location in ocean that covers 3/4 of earth surface.
I know which one the media outlets that are booking this guy are going to be pushing come Monday. It has all the right juicy bits in it. And the other one is kind of bland.