|
|
|
|
|
by TazeTSchnitzel
4120 days ago
|
|
How would it not be? Women weren't in work at first, because of patriarchy. After social reforms they slowly entered the workforce, but they were not paid as well and not given as good jobs. Things have improved over time, but there's still a gap. I don't see why it wouldn't be because of patriarchy. Look at history. |
|
"Although additional research in this area is clearly needed, this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers."
The entire issue is just politics. For example, studies have shown that taller people make significantly more money than shorter people, by an amount that exceeds the unexplained pay gap between men and women based on the average height difference between men and women. Back of the envelope math then implies that women get paid more than men of the same height who do the same job.
[1] http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20...