|
|
|
|
|
by Someone1234
4122 days ago
|
|
What a terrible name. So it is non-private private networking, great distinction there DO. I wonder why people are confused..? What about "Shared Intranet" instead. Why has the word "intranet" fallen out of style? And why use the word private to describe something that is inherently non-private by design? I actually think the addition of this free inter-droplet channel is amazing (and a potential massive cost saver), but the name sucks. |
|
It's not completely terrible. It's a private network in the usual sense of the word, in that it isn't part of the Internet.
> Why has the word "intranet" fallen out of style?
'Intranet' has other connotations that don't apply here. Mostly that it's an internal Web.