[venomsnake]

Lets say that a ruling that entitles consumers for the same right for digital book "services" as for physical would have been preferable.

[Oletros]

The ruling doesn't say anything about rights, just the type of VAT to be applied

[venomsnake]

Yes. But ruling in the opposite direction could be used as precedent for vendors to loosen the DRM licence crap.

[wvenable]

No this is the ruling that could be used as precedent for vendors to loosen the DRM license crap. If they want lower VAT for their products, they need to make e-books more like a good and less like a service.

[vertex-four]

No, it really couldn't. How something is taxed has little/nothing to do with what it actually is - tax people don't talk to copyright people.

[Oletros]

I can't understand how can it be done.