Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MrBuddyCasino 4124 days ago
I get that AMD wants this because it will make CPU performance less important for gamers, as they can't currently compete against Intel here. AMDs APU concept would become more attractive that way.

Valve etc. want this because OpenGL sucks, but DX is Win only.

Microsoft will want to defend its DX stronghold - can they, on a technical level? Will Nvidia play along?
2 comments
jamesfmilne 4124 days ago
NVIDIA will totally play along. They already have something that looks a lot like Vulcan, called NV_command_list, in their beta 346-series drivers.

Apologies for the SliderShare link, I hate SlideShare.

<http://www.slideshare.net/tlorach/opengl-nvidia-commandlista...

Sample code here:

<https://github.com/nvpro-samples>

link
datenwolf 4124 days ago
> Valve etc. want this because OpenGL sucks

Actually Valve labeled OpenGL to be "shockingly efficient" in one of their presentations (postmortem of porting the Source Engine to Linux).

link
jsheard 4124 days ago
I went back and checked, it was actually an nVidia guy who said that. Rich Geldreich from Valve was also there but he's expressed nothing but disdain for OpenGL since he left the company:

> "I know it's possible for Linux ports to equal or outperform their Windows counterparts, but it's hard. At Valve we had all the driver devs at our beck and call and it was still very difficult to get the Source engine's perf. and stability to where it needed to be relative to Windows. (And this was with a ~8 year old engine - it must be even harder with more modern engines.)"

http://richg42.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/state-of-linux-gaming....

link
datenwolf 4123 days ago
> I went back and checked, it was actually an nVidia guy who said that.

Hmm, makes sense. But then NVidia really loves OpenGL.

link