|
|
|
|
|
by GhotiFish
4123 days ago
|
|
To be honest here. The strings that are attached are strings for people who want to sell... Many open source projects do something like this, a dual license where the source code for the project is GPL, but the creator is willing to license it for something as non-gpl to people unwilling to release their source code. This requirement set by unreal is very very analogous. They just have some shifted priorities, however for me this project now meets the standard of what I would consider "ethical". Could it be better? Sure why not? It could be GPL dual license, people who want to benefit from open source but release closed source I think should have to pay, that would be better. However, this library can now be effectively used for open source initiatives. This is fantastic. That's my estimation of the situation anyway, you perhaps do not see it like this. Could you go further into your position? |
|
No it's can't be because UE4 is proprietary: http://opensource.org/osd