Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rlpb 4133 days ago
The manufacturer digitally stores the fingerprints of anyone who uses the lock. You want the manufacturer to give you a copy of the fingerprints to help you identify the person who broke into your house.

> ...and then your [sic] mad at the manufacturer of the door's lock.

There is no evidence that Uber is mad at Github.
1 comments
parfe 4133 days ago
No,Uber is fishing for data they don't need. They have an IP address of the intruder. Instead of demanding all the access logs for a months long period, why not compel Github to answer the question "Did this IP address access the Gist in question? If so, what are the timestamps?"

Instead Uber wants all github's access log data for the gist in question which sounds like more incompetence and desperation on Uber's part.

link
fixermark 4133 days ago
Or they believe the attacker likely accessed the information in the gist from several IP addresses; they want more trails to follow if the one bit of data (we are aware of) that they have proves cold. It's a sensible reason to subpoena, and it's also a fishing expedition so it's sensible for Github to not hand the data over without a court order.

Which is why we have courts.

link
tessierashpool 4132 days ago
incompetence, desperation, and a great way to shift some blame onto GitHub, in the eyes of people who know absolutely nothing about how this stuff works.

which could be the audience they're most concerned about.

link
tedunangst 4132 days ago
Are any of the people who know absolutely nothing about how this stuff works following the story on the register? Would anybody even know if the register hadn't decided to make a story out of it? Doesn't seem like a particularly effective blame shifting strategy to me.
link
tessierashpool 4132 days ago
it's also on VentureBeat, Slashdot, and a bunch of other places. google "GitHub Uber subpoena." it'll probably show up on TechCrunch and Valleywag by the end of the day.
link
tessierashpool 4129 days ago
also, and although I doubt you'll ever see this, I would bet almost anything that my statement was 100% accurate as long as you assume the audience this move was intended for is an internal audience at Uber.
link