[duaneb]

> getting whiny

Actually, they're subpoenaing. This is necessary to identify who may have accessed it; i don't think this is a suit over the privacy of gists.

[kordless]

> This is necessary to identify who may have accessed it

Actually, it's not. If Github's TOS (and their legal argument in response to the subpoena) is strong enough, Uber can go fly a kite.

[duaneb]

Fair—but they won't have the opportunity without the subpoena. Point is, the subpoena means nothing bad about github itself.