Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pards 4135 days ago
Something isn't necessarily true just because the majority of people believe it to be true.

At one point in history most people believed the world was flat.

3 comments

This is a very important point, and is something I (unfortunately) glossed over in the blog post:

In Augur, truth equals consensus. As such, the Augur oracle is intended to be used for events which are easily and objectively determinable after the event has occurred. (For example, the winner of an election.)

However, as you correctly point out, there are MANY cases where consensus might not reflect the truth, such as:

- Events where there is ongoing controversy about what happened (e.g., "Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was brought down by terrorists")

- Events where the outcome is subjective (e.g., "was Carter a good President?")

- Events where the outcome is unreasonably difficult to determine (e.g., "what is President Obama's checking account balance?")

These events are NOT good candidates for Augur! In fact, all questions include a "this was a bad question" answer, in case a user is asked to report on an ill-defined or unanswerable event.

Of course, Augur's oracle can dutifully report the consensus in these cases -- and the consensus very often will be "this was a bad question" -- but it's up to you to use your judgment as to whether this consensus is an accurate reflection of the truth.

Something isn't necessarily true just because the majority of people believe it to be true.

I'll add to that. At one point in history in 2014 most people believed that all their ancestors regarded the world as flat.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_Flat_Earth

Which point in history was that?
;) --- idea is that truth is a schelling point