|
|
|
|
|
|
by rpglover64
4124 days ago
|
|
|
I think the problem is not "if you find a frequentist (as opposed to bayesian) statistician", but "if you find a frequentist (as opposed to bayesian) e.g. biologist". Non-statisticians have been trained using bad, frequentist methods, and one way of forcing them to retrain is by forcing them to learn new statistical tools to get published. |
|
|