It was a light hearted piece of humor where a bank accepts an object for collateral. You know that, of course, but comments like that make you feel special I suppose.
> You know that, of course, but comments like that make you feel special I suppose.
Is that tone really necessary, or constructive? The question seemed to me perfectly civil; if it was snark for snark's sake, then it was a pretty harmless instance of that practice. It may have been disingenuous, but automatically to assume so seems more harmful than just answering the question (or even than ignoring it).
Is that tone really necessary, or constructive? The question seemed to me perfectly civil; if it was snark for snark's sake, then it was a pretty harmless instance of that practice. It may have been disingenuous, but automatically to assume so seems more harmful than just answering the question (or even than ignoring it).