|
|
|
|
|
by TylerE
4139 days ago
|
|
There is support for extensions, but they're, well, extensions. The only thing the protocol specifies is that a compliant implementation must pass-through unchanged any block it doesn't understand. Compare with HTTP/1.1 where for instance the entire content negotiation mechanism is optional and clients need to be able to deal with it not being available. |
|
So down the line, it will be pretty much exactly like HTTP 1.0 and 1.1 then.
Good to hear someone thought this thoroughly through before creating a mega-complex protocol unimplementable by most industry-grade engineers, which will also need to be debugged and maintained for all internet-eternity.