|
|
|
|
|
by oddx
4133 days ago
|
|
> Is it a news that corporations are creating "ecosystems" to make money, not to benefit third-parties? Corporations do their job to make money of course, but it's better to limit harm they can create when making money. Regulations are productive in many ways including regulation of possibility to destroy or significantly limit competitors and competition. > What if something wrong with the "strategy" of being able to be a very successful third party in someone's else ecosystem? Nothing wrong with it. The problem is that ecosystem owner can significantly limit competitors. > Google is no monopoly. There is windows mobile, of course. Strictly speaking yes, it isn't monopoly, but it is close enough to it, so it can use his position to harm competition. |
|
How, how does "significantly limit competitors" relate to the requirement to make an explicit, conscious choice by the user instead of allowing a quiet change of device settings?
Not allowing any third-party search apps or not allowing to change the default app by the user could be considered as a "significant limit", but there is no such restrictions.